Working Paper

Out of Sight, Out of Mind? The Effect of Peer Evaluators on In-Group Bias

WP FernandoGeorge OutOfSightOutOfMind.pdf

PDF DOCUMENT • 6.59 MB

OutOfSightOutOfMind.jpeg

We study how peers affect in-group bias. Exploiting several umpiring reforms in international cricket matches - where two umpires make independent decisions in each other’s presence - we show that home-team umpires are less biased when working with a neutral colleague, i.e. one who is neither a national of the home nor the foreign team. This temporary debiasing is driven by the social pressure umpires feel to be impartial in the presence of neutral peers. Performance evaluation by visually non-salient monitors does not reduce bias, suggesting that physical presence is an important component of debiasing and peer influence.

Related content

STEG Working Paper Series

The Great Upgrade

Alexandros Ragoussis, Jonathan Timmis • Research Theme 1: Firms, Frictions and Spillovers, and Industrial Policy
STEG Working Paper Series

Africa’s Growth Miracles

David Lagakos, Isaac Otoo, Juan Tabuenca • Research Theme 0: Data, Measurement, and Conceptual Framing
STEG Working Paper Series

Hollow State Expansion

James Hintson • Research Theme 5: The Role of the Public Sector
STEG Working Paper Series

Mobile Internet, Collateral and Banking

Angelo D’Andrea, Patrick Hitayezu, Kangni Kpodar, Nicola Limodio, Andrea F. Presbitero • Research Theme 1: Firms, Frictions and Spillovers, and Industrial Policy
STEG Working Paper Series

Misallocation and Product Choice

Stepan Gordeev, Sudhir Singh • Research Theme 3: Agricultural Productivity and Sectoral Gaps
STEG Working Paper Series

Financing Costs and Development

Tiago Cavalcanti, Joseph P. Kaboski, Bruno Martins, Cezar Santos • Research Theme 0: Data, Measurement, and Conceptual Framing